Skip to main content

Joker Origin Movie First Look: Image Analysis

There has been a lot of buzz surrounding the upcoming Joker Origin film, starring Joaquin Phoenix (Gladiator, Walk The Line) as the Joker. The film is the first in a line of films about DC characters that aren't connected to the DCEU. Over the weekend director, Todd Phillips (The Hangover, War Dogs) released the test for the Joker-Make-up on Twitter, which trended for quite a while and got fans interested in this project. Then, the day after, on-set footage was leaked of Joaquin Phoenix in his make-up as the Joker on the subway. And thanks to this one-two punch, this film has now become a hot commodity for DC. 
   So how much does this version of the Joker differentiate from other versions? And what does this mean for the current DCEU version of the character played by Jared Leto (Dallas Buyer's Club, Suicide Squad)? Let's dive in!

Joaquin Phoenix's Joker

Whilst Todd Phillips did tweet the make-up test for this, I was not a big fan. However, in the stills from the set of the film... He actually looks good. I can definitely see some inspiration from past incarnations of the character, such as Heath Ledger's Distorted Make-up and hair, and Caesar Romero's Colourful costume (Which I will discuss in a bit). But I really want to talk about Joaquin Phoenix because he is ACTING under that make-up! He looks like a man with a plan. This is something I always liked about the Joker. That he put on the disguise of a madman with no plan. But in reality, he's a mastermind playing everyone around him.

The Make-Up

The Make-up is clearly inspired by Heath Ledger's look from The Dark Knight (2008, Christopher Nolan) with the distorted and uncontrollable make-up. Whilst it is the same look from the test footage tweeted by Phillips I feel like the Make-up in these stills looks better. Mainly because it's more refined and not so goofy. The red lips are smaller in this picture so they don't look as child-like, and the Blue around the eyes is a lot more emphasised. Similar to how Ledger had black around his eyes, except Phoenix has more of a Harlequin look around the eyes 

The Costume

As for the costume. I'm not a fan. Whilst I like the callback to Caesar Romero's Joker from the 60's I don't think it works here. A friend of mine told me that it was because the make-up and the costume don't fit well together. And I have to agree. Whilst the make-up is messy the costume looks clean and the two don't mesh. Whilst you could say that Ledger's Joker had a sophisticated look I would that was also quite messy and matched well with his make-up. As for the colours. I get that they're trying to call back to Caesar Romero from the Adam West Show. But the bright red doesn't really work here. Mainly because it's too warm a shade of red. So it makes it less intimidating. Overall, I like that the filmmakers are trying to emulate the more classic look of the Joker. But overall I don't think it matches with the make-up or the tone of the film.

Jared Leto's Joker

What this means for Jared Leto's version of the Joker is a little unsure. What I will say is this is a very different take on the Joker compared to Leto's version. Whilst Leto's version is based on the works of comic book writers like Grant Morrison and Scott Snyder, who both re-imagined the character in a unique way, Phoenix's Joker based on more traditional looks. Because of this, I'm starting to feel that these two versions of the Joker can co-exist. I still believe that Leto can give a solid performance with his Joker, so long as he's given the right script. But it all depends on how well Phoenix's version is received by audiences. If audiences love this version then you can expect some changes to be made to Leto's version.

Conclusion

Overall, I like the way this Joker looks. It's not perfect, the costume I feel needs work, but it's interesting. And the inspirations from past iterations of the character are clearly on display. 

So that's my Image Analysis of the on-set stills of Joaquin Phoenix's Joker. What do you think of this look? Do you agree or disagree with anything that I said? Please write a comment down below. And, if you liked what you read then you can follow this blog for more content. Thank you for reading. :) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Auteurship: David Fincher

The Auteur theory is that a director's film reflects the director's personal creative vision.  I am going to use  David Fincher as an example, because he usually has similar aspects throughout all of his films such as bleakness of a setting; several single frames that flash, low-key lighting and characters that are in the shadows so you can’t see their faces. All of these styles can be found in Fight Club (1999). In most of Fincher’s films the settings seem to have a bleak and uninteresting look to them. In Fight Club this is shown in places like the office of where Jack works, the cancer support group hall, Jack’s apartment. All of these places are just different shades of the same colour (mainly green, grey or dark orange). This is to convey a sense of misery and darkness within the storyline, which the characters are just drifting through their lives. Something that Fincher portrays beautifully in Fight Club. This is a good example of David Fincher’s position as an Au...

Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker Review (No Spoilers)

The final episode in the sequel trilogy, and the overall Skywalker Saga, is finally out! Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker (2019, J.J Abrams) will hopefully answer the questions that have been set up since the beginning of this trilogy in Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015, J.J Abrams) . But due to fans being displeased with this new trilogy, such as the highly negative response from fans after the previous instalment Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017, Rian Johnson)  and with the latest anthology movie Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018, Ron Howard) being a financial disaster, can this movie live up to the success of its predecessors and redeem the franchise in the eyes of fans? First Thoughts This movie is good, I liked it as a movie. The action's good, the visuals are great and the characters are fun to watch. But as a finale to the overall Skywalker Saga, it's quite disappointing. The story feels more like it's trying to make up for lost time rather than tell a good stor...

Oz: The great and Powerful Review

When I first heard that this film was being made I was very skeptical. The Original film with Dorothy and the wicked witch was an important part of many people's childhood that it seemed that this prequel couldn't live up to it. But after seeing it at the cinema my skepticism was laid to rest. This film is AWESOME!!!    The film follows a similar structure narrative-wise to that of the Wizard of Oz. You start off with in Kansas where everything is in black-and-white, keeping to continuity, then you have the twister that takes the character to the land of Oz. The audience is then introduced important characters like Theodora and Evanora, we even get the journey down the yellow-brick road. The writers have brilliantly taken all these elements from the previous film and used them to create a contemporary origin to the Oz that children were introduced too in 1939.    James Franco was well cast in this role as a rude and selfish magician who w...