Skip to main content

Venom Review (Non-Spoilers)

Sony begins its new era of Spider-Man related films with their solo movie, Venom (2018, Ruben Fleischer). Featuring the fan-favourite Spidey Villain/Anti-Hero. With Marvel Studios and Sony sharing custody over Spider-Man (Tom Holland), allowing him to star in the MCU, Sony is hoping to make a bunch of movies focusing around characters that are part of the Spider-Man brand, and they are hoping that Venom will be there version of Deadpool (2016, Tim Miller), with an Anti-Hero who plays by his own rules. And with Tom Hardy (The Dark Knight Rises, Inception) playing the main character you can expect a good performance. 
   But with Sony's spotty track record when it comes to their Spider-Man property this movie can go either way. Hopefully, this will be more Sam Raimi (Evil Dead, Spider-Man) than Mark Webb (500 Days Of Summer, The Amazing Spider-Man).

First Thoughts

Overall, I think this film is good. It's got good action, acting and humour. It'll definitely please Venom fans and audiences who are out for a fun time at the cinema. However, I will that this film does have quite a few story-structure and pacing issues that hold it back from being great. 

Tom Hardy/Eddie Brock/Venom

Tom Hardy is exceptional in this film! If anything his performance as both Eddie Brock and Venom is enough to attract your attention to this film. I really enjoyed the interactions between both of those characters. From Eddie Brock's street-wise good guy to Venom's sadistic savagery. The two are able to bounce off each other very well. (Although it helps that they're played by the same actor). But I think what really helps Hardy's performance is that he's committed to the role. With a film like this, it's easy for an actor to not take it seriously but Hardy does and elevates his performance a lot. Tom Hardy did a great job as Venom!

Story/Third Act

The story in this film is fun. It's absurd and over-the-top but is very self-aware of this and is quite enjoyable. I also really liked the fact that this was a standalone story. Usually, when it comes to big-budget franchises they try to fit in too much to get audiences excited for the bigger connected universe. But that's absent in this film. It does give references to other parts of the Spider-Man mythos but they don't take attention away from the main story. Which is really good, because it allows the film to set up Venom. 
   However, I will say that the film does lose a lot of momentum in the third act where it feels like it's rushing just to get to the big finale. Some characters motivations seem to change out of nowhere purely just to benefit the story and other characters become under-developed as a result of the rushed third act. So whilst the big finale is fun and enjoyable to watch, the rush to get to that finale does take you out of the movie. If the writers patched this up early in the script then it could have been avoided.

Action

The action is really the highlight of this whole film! The Filmmakers really captured how Venom would fight. It's really fun to watch him tear through security guards like they were made of paper or to see just Eddie using his new strength and agility to outsmart his opponents when running. The best action scenes in this film are hands-down the car chase through San Francisco, where the Symbiotes powers are used in a really creative way, and the fight between Venom and the S.W.A.T team in the lobby of a building, where Venom's true power is on display in all it's violent beauty! My only criticism of the action is that there doesn't really seem to be an awful lot. Most of it is in the second act of the film and 

Tone and Style

In a sort of poetic way, this film's tone is similar to the early work of Sam Raimi, the director of the original Spider-Man films. Mixing horror elements with an absurd and over-top story, which also gives it a strong 90's vibe, that makes sense as that's when Venom became really popular under Todd McFarlane's writing on the Spider-Man comic. 

Credit Scenes

There are two credit scenes. One playing in the middle of the credits which sets up a sequel with a famous Venom character that I really want to see! If they can get a stronger script for that sequel than I have no doubt that it'll be great. And then there's one that plays at the end of the credits which is a short clip from Into The Spider-Verse. A film that I am very excited to watch in December!

Conclusion

This is a fun, over-the-top, crazy film that will definitely please fans of the character, and will act as an enjoyable time at the cinema. But it has issues such as pacing and a rushed third act that really hold it back. If they decided to make a sequel, I really that they can fix these problems and make a terrific film!

So that's my review for Venom. What did you think of the film? Do you agree or disagree with anything I said? Please leave a comment down below. And, if you liked what you read then you can follow this blog for more content. Thank you for reading!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Auteurship: David Fincher

The Auteur theory is that a director's film reflects the director's personal creative vision.  I am going to use  David Fincher as an example, because he usually has similar aspects throughout all of his films such as bleakness of a setting; several single frames that flash, low-key lighting and characters that are in the shadows so you can’t see their faces. All of these styles can be found in Fight Club (1999). In most of Fincher’s films the settings seem to have a bleak and uninteresting look to them. In Fight Club this is shown in places like the office of where Jack works, the cancer support group hall, Jack’s apartment. All of these places are just different shades of the same colour (mainly green, grey or dark orange). This is to convey a sense of misery and darkness within the storyline, which the characters are just drifting through their lives. Something that Fincher portrays beautifully in Fight Club. This is a good example of David Fincher’s position as an Au...

Oz: The great and Powerful Review

When I first heard that this film was being made I was very skeptical. The Original film with Dorothy and the wicked witch was an important part of many people's childhood that it seemed that this prequel couldn't live up to it. But after seeing it at the cinema my skepticism was laid to rest. This film is AWESOME!!!    The film follows a similar structure narrative-wise to that of the Wizard of Oz. You start off with in Kansas where everything is in black-and-white, keeping to continuity, then you have the twister that takes the character to the land of Oz. The audience is then introduced important characters like Theodora and Evanora, we even get the journey down the yellow-brick road. The writers have brilliantly taken all these elements from the previous film and used them to create a contemporary origin to the Oz that children were introduced too in 1939.    James Franco was well cast in this role as a rude and selfish magician who w...

Star Wars: The Last Jedi: Trailer Highlights

Star Wars: The Last Jedi New Poster So Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017) comes out in December and we're only now getting the second trailer, just two months away from the release date. Either Disney has seriously dropped the ball on the promotional campaign or they're just so confident in this film that they feel it doesn't require a lot of publicity for fans to get excited about. My guess would be the latter. Since the past two Disney-Produced Star Wars films have both raked in a combined total of $3,124,280,897, It'd be safe to say that Disney would think that. However, right before the trailer was released last night, director Rian Johnson (Looper, Brick) suggested to fans that they should avoid this trailer. WHAT?! What kind of a marketing tactic is that?! Perhaps if you wish for fans to avoid spoilers then you should urge the marketing campaign to avoid them at all costs. Initial Thoughts Yeah! This trailer has me more intrigued about the story than ever, ...