Skip to main content

Spider-Man Out of the MCU? - Situation Review

A couple of days ago it was revealed that re-negotiations between Sony and Disney around Spider-Man have fallen through and the character will be taken out of the MCU entirely. This has come as quite a shock to most fans, especially after the release of the latest movie Spider-Man: Far From Home (John Watts) which recently passed the $1 Billion mark in the worldwide box office. 
   So what does this mean for the future of the beloved Superhero? Well in this Situation Review I will be discussing why Sony did what they did and several possibilities for what will happen with Spider-Man.

Disney Vs Sony

So, the decision comes after Disney wanted to change the deal that they had with Sony so that they would gain 50% of the overall gross of the Spider-Man movies, rather than the 5% that they were currently receiving. A move that Sony wasn't happy with. 
   Now, if they were only talking about the movies then this would seem like a fair deal. The two studios would split the cost and the profit evenly. However, there are also other factors to take into account. Because the overall deal that Disney and Sony had also allowed for Disney to have the merchandising rights for Spider-Man and for him to be included in their theme park attractions. And since that hasn't really been mentioned by news headlines, it seems like that part of the deal remains unchanged. Meaning that Disney would actually be gaining a lot more than just 50% of the overall profits made from Spider-Man. Something that Sony is understandably not too happy with. Especially since Spider-Man is their most successful franchise.

Could Spider-Man still be in the MCU?

Actually, yes. Nothing has been set in stone just yet so a deal can still be made. Both companies have invested a lot of time into making Spider-Man a part of the MCU and I doubt that they would let it fall apart like this. Also, with the construction underway for Disney's new Marvel-Land, a theme park resort which Spider-Man is a big part of, it's not in their best interest to let negotiations fall through. Hopefully, the two companies can come to a new deal that benefits them both. Fans have really taken to the MCU's Spider-Man and really don't want his involvement to end. Especially with the big shock twist ending of Far From Home and the set-up for Spider-Man to become a key figure in the MCU going forward. So I think that both companies will go back into negotiations pretty soon, particularly with the D23 expo on the horizon.

If Spider-Man does leave the MCU

If Sony and Disney can't reach a deal then it's really not the end of the world. Fans are really turning against Sony, saying that they won't be able to make good Spider-Man movies without Marvel Studios. And, while I understand why fans would think that, and that Far From Home probably wouldn't have made a $1 billion if it wasn't part of the MCU, I don't think that Sony would falter without Marvel. They have produced some bad Spider-Man movies but they've also made a lot of good ones too! The Raimi movies are still beloved to this day, Venom (2018, Ruben Fleischer) may not have been a critical success but fans did enjoy it with 80% Audience Score on Rotten Tomatoes. And its upcoming sequel, which recently got Andy Serkis (Lord Of The Rings, Mowgli) to direct. And then there's Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018, Peter Ramsey, Bob Persichetti, Rodney Rothman) was adored by Spider-Man fans and even won the Oscar for Best animated movie. 
   So I think, if a new deal isn't reached, Sony will be okay creating Spider-Man content, even without Marvel Studios and Disney.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I believe that the two studios should try and reach a new deal that benefits them both, as fans really want to see Spider-Man's role grow bigger in the MCU. Although, I also believe that 50% is too much for Disney to have when it comes to the movies, as they're also earning profits from the merchandising rights for the character. 
   Also, if the worst-case scenario does happen then it's not the end of the world. Sony may have faltered with some of their Spider-Man projects but they have also done quite a few good things too, which I believe they will continue to do, even without Marvel Studios.

And that's my Situation Review for Spider-Man potentially leaving the MCU. What do you think of the situation? Do you agree or disagree with what I had to say? Please leave a comment down below. And, if you liked what you've read then you can follow this blog for more content. Thank you for reading!

Comments

  1. I think you're right in that they'll eventually come to a deal! It's not in Disney's interests to lose Spider-Man, really.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! And yeah, it really isn't in their interest. Given what a hot commodity Spider-Man is!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Auteurship: David Fincher

The Auteur theory is that a director's film reflects the director's personal creative vision.  I am going to use  David Fincher as an example, because he usually has similar aspects throughout all of his films such as bleakness of a setting; several single frames that flash, low-key lighting and characters that are in the shadows so you can’t see their faces. All of these styles can be found in Fight Club (1999). In most of Fincher’s films the settings seem to have a bleak and uninteresting look to them. In Fight Club this is shown in places like the office of where Jack works, the cancer support group hall, Jack’s apartment. All of these places are just different shades of the same colour (mainly green, grey or dark orange). This is to convey a sense of misery and darkness within the storyline, which the characters are just drifting through their lives. Something that Fincher portrays beautifully in Fight Club. This is a good example of David Fincher’s position as an Au...

Oz: The great and Powerful Review

When I first heard that this film was being made I was very skeptical. The Original film with Dorothy and the wicked witch was an important part of many people's childhood that it seemed that this prequel couldn't live up to it. But after seeing it at the cinema my skepticism was laid to rest. This film is AWESOME!!!    The film follows a similar structure narrative-wise to that of the Wizard of Oz. You start off with in Kansas where everything is in black-and-white, keeping to continuity, then you have the twister that takes the character to the land of Oz. The audience is then introduced important characters like Theodora and Evanora, we even get the journey down the yellow-brick road. The writers have brilliantly taken all these elements from the previous film and used them to create a contemporary origin to the Oz that children were introduced too in 1939.    James Franco was well cast in this role as a rude and selfish magician who w...

Star Wars: The Last Jedi: Trailer Highlights

Star Wars: The Last Jedi New Poster So Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017) comes out in December and we're only now getting the second trailer, just two months away from the release date. Either Disney has seriously dropped the ball on the promotional campaign or they're just so confident in this film that they feel it doesn't require a lot of publicity for fans to get excited about. My guess would be the latter. Since the past two Disney-Produced Star Wars films have both raked in a combined total of $3,124,280,897, It'd be safe to say that Disney would think that. However, right before the trailer was released last night, director Rian Johnson (Looper, Brick) suggested to fans that they should avoid this trailer. WHAT?! What kind of a marketing tactic is that?! Perhaps if you wish for fans to avoid spoilers then you should urge the marketing campaign to avoid them at all costs. Initial Thoughts Yeah! This trailer has me more intrigued about the story than ever, ...