Skip to main content

John Wick 3: Parabellum Review (No Spoilers)

In 2014 the world was introduced to sleeper-hit John Wick (Chad Stahelski, David Leitch) which won fans over with its great action, cinematography, world-building and the best performance from Keanu Reeves since The Matrix (1999, The Wachowskis). And then in 2016 the sequel continued and improved on the story. And now the third wishes to push its protagonist into far darker territory. Now with no allies and a $14 million bounty on his head, the stakes have never been higher and the carnage has never been more brutal!

Initial Thoughts

This is a great follow-up to the previous movies! Definitely levelling up from John Wick 2 because everything is dialled up to an eleven! The action is incredible, the stuntwork is amazing and the world of the assassins just getting bigger and far more interesting!

Keanu Reeves/John Wick

John Wick is the role that Keanu Reeves was born to play. Like Tom Cruise with Ethan Hunt, Reeves shows off his merits as a hard-working action star by doing most of his own stunts and looking great while doing it. But Reeves is also able to sell the pain of John Wick. And Wick gets the stuffing kicked out of him... a lot. Which helps to humanise his character. Sure, his line delivery is still flat but Reeves's physicality is enough to make you sympathise with John Wick.

Mark Dacascos/Zero

The movie introduced a new antagonist, Zero (Mark Dacascos) who, much like Wick is a force to be reckoned with. The way he takes down his enemies with such ease is very disturbing, which makes him a great adversary for Wick. Their fight in the third act is definitely a highlight for this movie. Which is really good because, as good as the first two movies are, the final fights are a little disappointing compared to everything else. So I was very happy that they improved on that. 

Action

Now, what would a John Wick movie be without some killer action and stunt work? This is some of the best practical and well-choreographed action since Mission Impossible: Fallout (2018, Christopher McQuarrie). But what makes the action scenes so good is that they're quite distinct from one another and each one holds a different challenge for Wick. Something that I had a problem with the previous movies was that the action never really got bigger. It stayed on the same difficulty level. But I'm happy that in this movie they've fixed that and the action gets more intense and challenging as the story goes on.

Style

What really separates this movie series from any other action series is its style. This movie has a lot of great set-pieces, that are occasionally wrecked in the carnage, hard-lighting and an eye-catching colour palette that makes every shot just pop! Giving this movie series its own distinct personality, which is really good in a cinema landscape where most action movies look very much alike and have no personal style.

World-Building

Besides the action, another thing that this series is praised for is its world-building. Which I'm happy to say is built even more in this movie. Diving a little into John Wick's origins, the hierarchy of the Assassins and the different struggles of power. So that was very interesting to watch and I'm very interested to see how they build on it even more, particularly with the supposed spin-offs like Ballerina, which is slightly dived into in this movie, and the TV show The Continental.

Conclusion

If you love action movies then you will absolutely love John Wick 3: Parabellum! The action is bigger and better than ever, the set pieces are incredible and the world of the Assassins just gets keeps on expanding.

So that's my review of John Wick 3: Parabellum. What did you think of the movie? Do you agree or disagree with anything I have just said? Please leave a comment down below. And, if you liked this review then you can follow this blog for more content. Thank you for reading! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Star Wars Hype

If you're going to do a film blog you need to talk about Star Wars! In the fall of 2012 it was announced that Disney had bought Lucasfilm from mastermind George Lucas and, in effect, were to create a new Star Wars trilogy. At first fans weren't too happy about the news. Mainly because the last Star Wars trilogy didn't live up to the standards of the original and also the films would be produced by Disney, a company well known for happy, cheery and very family-friendly fairytale adaptations (Similar reactions to how Marvel fans reacted when Disney bought the rights to Marvel Studios). But now it seems everyone's had a change of heart. Everyone is waiting eagerly for this next chapter in the saga to be released, analysts are expecting it to be the biggest releases of 2015, and this is the year which saw Jurassic World top The Avengers to be the third highest grossing film of all time. So what's exactly got the fans to do a complete 180 and get on board with the n...

Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker Review (No Spoilers)

The final episode in the sequel trilogy, and the overall Skywalker Saga, is finally out! Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker (2019, J.J Abrams) will hopefully answer the questions that have been set up since the beginning of this trilogy in Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015, J.J Abrams) . But due to fans being displeased with this new trilogy, such as the highly negative response from fans after the previous instalment Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017, Rian Johnson)  and with the latest anthology movie Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018, Ron Howard) being a financial disaster, can this movie live up to the success of its predecessors and redeem the franchise in the eyes of fans? First Thoughts This movie is good, I liked it as a movie. The action's good, the visuals are great and the characters are fun to watch. But as a finale to the overall Skywalker Saga, it's quite disappointing. The story feels more like it's trying to make up for lost time rather than tell a good stor...

Auteurship: David Fincher

The Auteur theory is that a director's film reflects the director's personal creative vision.  I am going to use  David Fincher as an example, because he usually has similar aspects throughout all of his films such as bleakness of a setting; several single frames that flash, low-key lighting and characters that are in the shadows so you can’t see their faces. All of these styles can be found in Fight Club (1999). In most of Fincher’s films the settings seem to have a bleak and uninteresting look to them. In Fight Club this is shown in places like the office of where Jack works, the cancer support group hall, Jack’s apartment. All of these places are just different shades of the same colour (mainly green, grey or dark orange). This is to convey a sense of misery and darkness within the storyline, which the characters are just drifting through their lives. Something that Fincher portrays beautifully in Fight Club. This is a good example of David Fincher’s position as an Au...