Skip to main content

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes Of Grindelwald Review (Non-Spoilers)

In 2016 the Harry Potter franchise was brought back to the big screen with Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them (2016, David Yates) which built on the franchise, gave audiences a new look at the Wizarding World and introduced everyone to Newt Scamander, played by the talented Eddie Redmayne (Theory Of Everything, The Danish Girl). And now its sequel hopes to continue that story. Now focusing on the war between the Ministry and Gellert Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) a dark wizard who is crucial to the character development of everyone's favourite future headmaster, Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law). Boasting a stellar cast and incredible Visuals, how well does it live up to previous Wizarding World movies?

First Thoughts

Overall, I liked this film. It’s really good to step back into the Wizarding World and the film does a good job of building on it. And not just the world, but the characters as well are developed more in this film. However, the film does feel a little empty. The film doesn’t really have a lot going for it in terms of plot and feels a little more like a set up for a bigger sequel.

Eddie Redmayne/Newt Scamander

Eddie Redmayne does a really good job as Newt Scamander. I enjoyed him a lot in the first Fantastic Beasts and I enjoyed him in this film. He has a charm and wit about him that makes audiences love him. Although, whilst he is an enjoyable character to watch, I keep questioning why he’s necessary to the story. The first film was a fitting narrative for Newt’s character, but this story isn’t. This story is about the Ministry’s struggle with Grindelwald, so why is Newt there? Why does Dumbledore insist that Newt take part? He’s not a fighter. And the excuse given for why Dumbledore chooses him is non-sensical. If the writers wanted Newt to be the main character than the narrative should be more suited to his character.

Katherine Waterston/Tina Goldstein

I enjoyed Tina Goldstein in the first film and I like her even more in this film. Especially her new look with the black trench coat. She looks so cool! Also, she seems to be the most practical one out of the new group of main characters. Out of the new characters, she’s the one who is best suited to this narrative. She’s strong, intelligent and can handle herself in a situation, but still has this sweet and innocent side to her. And I did really enjoy her scenes with Newt, although that relationship is given some unnecessary friction that doesn’t benefit anyone except drag out a will-they/won’t-they dynamic. But Overall Tina is arguably my favourite character in this film.

Jude Law/Albus Dumbledore

Jude Law (Sherlock Holmes, King Arthur) is now the third actor to play Albus Dumbledore in Live-Action. And he definitely lives up to previous incarnations. Jude Law so good as Dumbledore! He’s quite charismatic and lovable. So much so that it’s a wonder why some of the characters in this film don’t like him! He’s just so charming. However, like most characters in this film, Albus is given little screen time, which is kind of disappointing. Hopefully, in the sequel, he’ll be given more to do.

Johnny Depp/Gellert Grindelwald

I really enjoyed Grindelwald in this film. And Depp delivers a really engaging performance, even if his screen time is limited. But anytime he’s on screen he steals the show. He’s a very different villain from Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) from the original Harry Potter films. He’s not as menacing as Voldemort was, but he was quite sinister. Especially in the opening scene where his power and menace are completely on display in all its glory. The only problem is that the film doesn’t really focus that much on Grindelwald, which is due to the abundance of characters that the film tries to serve. But the man’s name is in the title! He should have had more screen time or more character development. But we don’t know that much about him.

Dan Fogler & Alison Sudol/Queenie and Jacob

These two had a pretty good storyline in this film. With the issue of their romance being frowned upon.  And both are brilliant in their own rights. Jacob is the lovable, down-to-earth guy and Queenie being the adorkable weirdo. But their relationship is really interesting to watch and it’s good to see the different ways in which both try to handle their forbidden love. I’m really interested to see where the sequel takes these two as they’re left on such an emotional cliff-hanger in the end.

Too many supporting characters

The main problem with this film is that there are so many characters that the story keeps trying to shift between. And because of this, no character gets to have any development or arc and the narrative feels splintered and empty. I believe if several characters were taken out and left for future films or just had their sub-plots toned down then the plot would have been much more coherent.

World-Building

What this film does an exceptional job at building on the Wizarding World. Visiting the magical community in Paris, which was beautiful and unique compared to London and New York. and introducing all-new magical creatures that look incredible. So if you just love the world of Harry Potter then you will really like this film in that regard.

The Franchise-Trap

This is something that happens to most films that are part of a franchise. The writers are so concerned with setting up a sequel, or spin-off movies, that the film in question feels half-baked at best. We’ve seen it happen with The Mummy (2017, Alex Kurtzman), Assassin’s Creed (2017, Justin Kurzel) and several others. Which is annoying. Audiences paid to see a movie. Not a set-up for a bigger movie! Which is what The Crimes Of Grindelwald is. It’s still an enjoyable movie. But it just feels like filler until the next instalment.

Conclusion

Overall, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes Of Grindelwald is an enjoyable, fun film that will service any Harry Potter fan looking for their Potter fix. But as a film its story is a mess, the characters are under-developed and it's more focused on setting up a better sequel rather than just being a good movie.

So that's my review of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes Of Grindelwald. What did you think of the film? Do you agree or disagree with anything I've said? Leave a comment down below. And, if you like what you've read then please follow this blog for more content. Thank you for reading!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spider-Man Out of the MCU? - Situation Review

A couple of days ago it was revealed that re-negotiations between Sony and Disney around Spider-Man have fallen through and the character will be taken out of the MCU entirely. This has come as quite a shock to most fans, especially after the release of the latest movie Spider-Man: Far From Home (John Watts)  which recently passed the $1 Billion mark in the worldwide box office.     So what does this mean for the future of the beloved Superhero? Well in this Situation Review I will be discussing why Sony did what they did and several possibilities for what will happen with Spider-Man. Disney Vs Sony So, the decision comes after Disney wanted to change the deal that they had with Sony so that they would gain 50% of the overall gross of the Spider-Man movies, rather than the 5% that they were currently receiving. A move that Sony wasn't happy with.     Now, if they were only talking about the movies then this would seem like a fair deal. The two studios would split the c

SDCC 2018. Top Five Movie Trailers

SDCC has come and gone, and with it, a whole load of movie trailers have dropped for fans to sink their teeth into! Overall, it seems that Warner Bros. dominated the convention, bringing in new content from most of their divisions, such as DC, The Wizarding World and their Monster Universe. So, without further ado, here is my top 5 list of the movie trailers that were released this year for Comic-Con. 5. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes Of Grindelwald The hype for this new chapter in the Wizarding World continues with the latest trailer. Whilst the trailer doesn't really reveal a lot more than the previous trailer it does give us some good moments. The beginning with Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) as a child showing his greatest fear is working behind a desk or that Dumbledore (Jude Law)  sees Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) in the Mirror of Erised. We even get to see new beasts, such as the strange cat creatures, and the first look at Nicholas Flemel, the creator of the Philosoph

Spider-Man: Far From Home Review (No Spider-Man spoilers, Endgame Spoilers)

So after the immense success of Avengers: Endgame (2019, Joe & Anthony Russo) , becoming the 2nd highest grossing movie of all time. And now, Marvel hopes to continue their ongoing story with Season 2 Episode 1. Spider-Man: Far From Home (Jon Watts) . The second movie in the MCU's new Spider-Man trilogy, which has proved incredibly popular with fans of both the MCU and Spider-Man in general. But with things like the events of Endgame to deal with, will this movie be weighed down by the weight of that movie? Or can it possibly hold its own? Marvel has had a pretty good run this year. Hopefully, it doesn't trip at the finish line. Initial Thoughts This is a damn good follow-up to Endgame . It's nowhere near as big in scope but it's definitely a good start to a new chapter in the MCU. Focusing more on the aftermath of Endgame and how Spider-Man is coping in a post-Iron Man world and trying to sort out his life as Peter Parker.  Spider-Man/Peter Parker/Tom Ho