Skip to main content

Toy Story 4 Review (No Spoilers)

Toy Story (1995, John Lasseter) is arguably one of the most influential movies when it comes to animation. Pioneering the digital age of animated movies, which has now eclipsed the more traditional hand-drawn method, and made the Pixar the top animation studio in Hollywood! And still to this day the Toy Story franchise is Pixar's biggest hit. Audiences initially thought that Toy Story 3 (2010, Lee Unkrich) would be the ending for this franchise. With the toys saying goodbye their owner, Andy, in quite an emotional way. 
   But now it seems that Pixar isn't quite done with Toy Story just yet! As this new instalment brings back everyone's favourite characters for one last ride! But after the love and praise that the last instalment received, can this new movie live up to the hype?

Initial Thoughts

This is a good movie. It's fun, enjoyable and hilarious. Plus, fans of the previous movies will get quite a kick out of it. However, I got to say, compared to the previous movies, particularly Toy Story 3 which I think ended the franchise story on a really good note, it doesn't really live up to the hype. Feeling more like a continuation to an already perfect goodbye rather than a final goodbye.

Woody/Tom Hanks

Usually, when it comes to actors reprising their roles after long periods of time there seems to be something missing in their performance. They don't particularly care much for the character anymore. But luckily, that is not the case with Tom Hanks! (Big, Cast Away) He plays Wood with the same level of enthusiasm that he had all the way back in 1995. This movie has a very heavy focus on Woody, which is not unwarranted as he is the overall favourite for most fans of this franchise. But the movie takes Woody into new territory. Questioning the role he plays in bringing joy to his kid and doing his best to stay relevant. A little resemblance to the problem toys and dolls are having at the moment. With the world going digital, kids more interested in video games and computers and big-brand shops like Toys R Us closing down, it seems that Woody's storyline was a reflection on that. But bottom line it was great seeing Woody back in action! 

Buzz Lightyear/Tim Allen

Sadly, due to this movie being focused on Woody, Buzz doesn't get as much of a storyline in this movie and is sadly sidelined for the majority of the time. Which is kind of annoying as the relationship between him and Woody has been such an important part of this franchise. But this movie seems to forget that, leaving him as more of a side-character than he was in older movies. However, he does have his moments, his interactions with new toys Ducky and Bunny (Keegan-Michael Key & Jordan Peele) are brilliant and 

Bo Peep/Annie Potts

I quite liked Bo Peep in this movie. She is very different from how she was in the previous movies and it worked! now re-imagined as a Mad Max-esque scavenger who's incredibly resourceful. I really enjoyed this new Bo as she has a lot more character than she did in the previous movies. But also, the relationship between her and Woody is different, as they've clearly grown apart and lead separate lives and different views on how the world works, and can they find that spark that they had all of those years ago? This was a very interesting storyline that I thought was handled rather well. Overall, Bo Peep got quite an upgrade in this movie and I was very happy with it!

New Toys

Really the majority of laughs come from the new character in this movie. Like, Ducky and Bunny, who are both hilariously sinister in their methods, which is made all the funnier by their cute and fluffy designs. Key and Peele have always done well with dark humour and they do a good job of delivering a more kid-friendly version of their work. And then there Duke Caboom, the self-doubting stuntman played brilliantly by Keanu Reeves (The Matrix, John Wick). I didn't think Reeves would do well in this role, mainly because he's never been great at line-delivery. But I'm happy to say I was wrong and Reeves was great in this role, with his character being my favourite new character in this movie!

Old Toys

As for the older characters I'm sad to say that they are even more side-lined than Buzz is. Even Jessie (Joan Cusack) who is a favourite for many fans, doesn't really have anything to do in this movie. Which is really disappointing. Toy Story 3 did a better job at balancing all of its characters, whilst this movie doesn't really do that. Older characters are pushed aside for the newer ones.

Animation

As for the animation, Toy Story has never looked better! The attention to detail in this movie is astounding! The character designs to the environments. There are a lot of dust bunnies and cobwebs in this movie and they look so well done! Also, in a brief moment in the movie, we see Andy again and he looks so much better than how he looked before. Back in 1995 Pixar didn't quite have human faces down and they looked pretty weird but now they have it nailed, thankfully!

Emotion over Narrative

My biggest concern with this movie is its heavy reliance on nostalgia. It seems more interested in getting its older audiences to cry than it is telling a coherent story and entertaining its younger audiences. One of my friends, after seeing the movie, was quite annoyed that the characters were making decisions that she felt they wouldn't normally make just so the story can seem more emotional, and I agreed with her! I know that making audiences cry is something Pixar is well known for, but I felt that they sacrificed the story for that emotional moment.

Conclusion

Overall, this is a fun movie. And, if you like Toy Story then you will definitely like this movie! However, in terms of being a final ending, it's a bit of a whimper. I really felt that Toy Story 3 was a much better farewell to these characters compared to this, but it was still a very good time and, if you grew up with these movies then you'll enjoy it.

So that's my review for Toy Story 4. What did you think of the movie? Do you agree or disagree with anything I said? Leave a comment down below. And, if you liked this review then you can follow this blog for more content. Thank you for reading!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker Review (No Spoilers)

The final episode in the sequel trilogy, and the overall Skywalker Saga, is finally out! Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker (2019, J.J Abrams) will hopefully answer the questions that have been set up since the beginning of this trilogy in Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015, J.J Abrams) . But due to fans being displeased with this new trilogy, such as the highly negative response from fans after the previous instalment Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017, Rian Johnson)  and with the latest anthology movie Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018, Ron Howard) being a financial disaster, can this movie live up to the success of its predecessors and redeem the franchise in the eyes of fans? First Thoughts This movie is good, I liked it as a movie. The action's good, the visuals are great and the characters are fun to watch. But as a finale to the overall Skywalker Saga, it's quite disappointing. The story feels more like it's trying to make up for lost time rather than tell a good stor...

Man of Steel-Review

2013 marks the 75th anniversary of the very first Superhero: Superman, and in honour of this iconic character DC and Warner Bros. have rebooted the franchise for a film, and it came out looking amazing! This film had so many great qualities to it that made it so beautiful. such as the mesmerizing SFX, the awesome action, the high standard acting and more. This is definitely a film that will be remembered for years to come. The film starts off on Krypton, where Scientist Jor-El (Russell Crowe) is pleading to the world's council about the destruction of the planet. Already we are shown a Krypton that has been brought to death due to individuals believing themselves to be like Gods without consequence. This is a theme throughout the whole film that Kryptonians believed themselves to be like Gods, as is presented through the fact that Kryptonians are grown rather than naturally birthed, the extraction of the Krypton's core for energy and through General Zod who values one group o...

Auteurship: David Fincher

The Auteur theory is that a director's film reflects the director's personal creative vision.  I am going to use  David Fincher as an example, because he usually has similar aspects throughout all of his films such as bleakness of a setting; several single frames that flash, low-key lighting and characters that are in the shadows so you can’t see their faces. All of these styles can be found in Fight Club (1999). In most of Fincher’s films the settings seem to have a bleak and uninteresting look to them. In Fight Club this is shown in places like the office of where Jack works, the cancer support group hall, Jack’s apartment. All of these places are just different shades of the same colour (mainly green, grey or dark orange). This is to convey a sense of misery and darkness within the storyline, which the characters are just drifting through their lives. Something that Fincher portrays beautifully in Fight Club. This is a good example of David Fincher’s position as an Au...