Skip to main content

Macbeth Review

After seeing the impressive trailers fro this film, not to mention my admiration for Shakespeare, I had some high expectations for this film when I bought my ticket for it. So imagine the terrific standard of this film when I say this film heavily exceeded my expectations with flying colours! This film is perhaps the best Shakespeare film adaptation that audiences have seen in a while. Not since the time of Kenneth Branagh has it been this good!

The part where the film excels the most is the visuals. Believe it or not it's actually rare for a film set in Scotland to be filmed in Scotland. Braveheart was mostly filmed in Northern Ireland. Which is really strange due to how beautiful Scotland is. This is something that the film captures indefinitely, as director Justin Kurzel and cinematographer Adam Arkapaw making every shot look more like a painting rather than any ordinary film, capturing the majestic look of the Scottish terrain. This is perhaps the closest a film has been to portraying how Medieval Scotland would have looked like.

Another thing about the visuals, and the story itself, is that the film doesn't shy away from the gore and filthiness of the medieval times. With blood soaked battlefields and gritty set pieces. Whenever a blow lands on a soldier the audience is absolutely convinced that they're in extreme pain. And this works incredibly well for the final battle between Macbeth and Macduff.

Whilst the film's visuals are fantastic they're not the only things that carry it. The two main actors, Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard act out amazing performances as one of literature's most psychotic married couples. Fassbender seems perfect for the role as he already has that look of a stone-cold leader and warrior, and his portrayal of Macbeth's slow descent into madness is mesmerising. Audiences genuinely feel for this tyrant as he loses his mind and then grip over Scotland. However, Fassbender's performance is equally matched by Cotillard's Lady Macbeth, who also descends into madness but mainly due to the loss of her child. Which is a new feature added to the film that I actually liked as the loss of a child is such a traumatising experience that it would make sense that it would break her and force her to go on this dark path. I also really liked that they let Cotillard keep her French accent, keeping it more historically accurate as it was common practice for British lords to marry women from France. Overall, these two performances were so enchanting that you can't help but feel sorry for the evil power couple.

Whilst the film is just about flawless as an adaptation I did have one problem with it and that was casting. with the exception of Michael Fassbender Marion Cotillard, I believe that the film might have been a bit more authentic if the main cast was completely Scottish. Most of the main cast were English, such as David Thewlis playing king Duncan, Paddy Considine playing Banquo and Sean Harris as Macduff. These are all fine actors however, it is extremely difficult to do a Scottish accent if you're not from Scotland. Although the actors do a fairly decent job, this sadly shows whenever they talk. However, for global audiences this won't be much of a problem so it shouldn't bother them so much. But, personally, as someone who's lived in Scotland for more than two years now, it took me out of the film on occasion.

Overall this film is everything you'd want a Shakespeare adaptation to be: Loyal to the source material and to the time period it was set in. It captures the beauty of Scotland perfectly, more than any other film. The main actors give out terrific portrayals of their roles and add more to the dark and gruesome atmosphere of the film.

9/10



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Auteurship: David Fincher

The Auteur theory is that a director's film reflects the director's personal creative vision.  I am going to use  David Fincher as an example, because he usually has similar aspects throughout all of his films such as bleakness of a setting; several single frames that flash, low-key lighting and characters that are in the shadows so you can’t see their faces. All of these styles can be found in Fight Club (1999). In most of Fincher’s films the settings seem to have a bleak and uninteresting look to them. In Fight Club this is shown in places like the office of where Jack works, the cancer support group hall, Jack’s apartment. All of these places are just different shades of the same colour (mainly green, grey or dark orange). This is to convey a sense of misery and darkness within the storyline, which the characters are just drifting through their lives. Something that Fincher portrays beautifully in Fight Club. This is a good example of David Fincher’s position as an Au...

Oz: The great and Powerful Review

When I first heard that this film was being made I was very skeptical. The Original film with Dorothy and the wicked witch was an important part of many people's childhood that it seemed that this prequel couldn't live up to it. But after seeing it at the cinema my skepticism was laid to rest. This film is AWESOME!!!    The film follows a similar structure narrative-wise to that of the Wizard of Oz. You start off with in Kansas where everything is in black-and-white, keeping to continuity, then you have the twister that takes the character to the land of Oz. The audience is then introduced important characters like Theodora and Evanora, we even get the journey down the yellow-brick road. The writers have brilliantly taken all these elements from the previous film and used them to create a contemporary origin to the Oz that children were introduced too in 1939.    James Franco was well cast in this role as a rude and selfish magician who w...

Star Wars: The Last Jedi: Trailer Highlights

Star Wars: The Last Jedi New Poster So Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017) comes out in December and we're only now getting the second trailer, just two months away from the release date. Either Disney has seriously dropped the ball on the promotional campaign or they're just so confident in this film that they feel it doesn't require a lot of publicity for fans to get excited about. My guess would be the latter. Since the past two Disney-Produced Star Wars films have both raked in a combined total of $3,124,280,897, It'd be safe to say that Disney would think that. However, right before the trailer was released last night, director Rian Johnson (Looper, Brick) suggested to fans that they should avoid this trailer. WHAT?! What kind of a marketing tactic is that?! Perhaps if you wish for fans to avoid spoilers then you should urge the marketing campaign to avoid them at all costs. Initial Thoughts Yeah! This trailer has me more intrigued about the story than ever, ...